this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2022
15 points (94.1% liked)
Asklemmy
43831 readers
911 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I do not want AI to start creating art, it just devalues art as a whole, and automates something that never should have been automated.
I actually see this as a positive development because AI will fill the niche of commercial illustration and this could lead to commercialization of art in the long run. If AI can crap out commercial art quickly and cheaply then actual art will be done for the sake of art.
art is already super devaluated. anything mainstream in art I can't call actual art other than good production/aesthetics. So nevermind; actual artists will still do actual art while commercial artists will keep doing souless comercialized content.