this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2022
26 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43404 readers
1310 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
All instances (mostly lemmy and lemmygrad) are experiencing a steady increase in usership.
Is lemmy like or the same thing as mastodon? Like ok, I LOVED reddit. However there are so many crazy, Whitney, and totalitarian moderators who shut you down for defending your position or saying anything that goes against the echo chamber. I always had this 'feeling' of pressure to watch what I say. So at that point, it kills the experience. If I say you're an ass kisser, I'm permanently banned? How can anyone last on there? The internet is the wild west, you should be able to say what you want
As one of the moderators on a subreddit with a tight, strongly enforced civility policy, it really is one of the few things keeping the sub from chaos. So much of political discourse these days is either in echo chambers or has degraded discourse. Sure you can say whatever, but the whatever slowly becomes worth less. We've been told by multiple users that the culture our rules foster has made it so that the users have a place to have serious political discussions with a broad range of people in a way that they haven't in a long time. That's important because many people have given up on political discussions with people who aren't like-minded.
Alternatively, I'll put it this way: it's possible to thoroughly discuss a political matter without touching personal insults. When there is nothing stopping personal insults, Internet discussions tend to be "won" by the trolliest trolls and the loudest yellers, not the best ideas. The people with the best ideas give up as they get drowned out.
It's a weird question. Like 'are grapes like oranges'.
Mastodon is a federated ('Fediverse' due to use of ActivityPub protocol) microblogging (think twitter) software, same with Pleroma and some others. Admins can host their own website and set their own rules, those websites can interact with other sites.
Lemmy is also a federated (Fediverse) software, but it's a link aggregator (think reddit). We're on the lemmy.ml instance, which has its own topic and rules. There are some other ones that aim to be more liberal, and a few that try to be 'free speech', but are inevitably flooded by its own echo chamber of the kind of people other places don't want around.
Yes*. Although not each site on that net wants to be wild. If I'm having a serious discussion on a site where that's expected (like a science topic forum), why should we tolerate someone with no idea what they're talking about spamming unconstructive rambling about them hating us? So you inevitably do get communities and social circles that do make restrictions and enforce them in order to function, even on alleged 'free speech' sites. It's all about finding the right sites, rather than expecting every site to have to listen to everything.