this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
77 points (94.3% liked)
Television
4602 readers
53 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well they did do shots where they showed the whole thing. They had a lot of sweeping shots that showed the size of the stadium and the length of the... i don't know what they call it, gallery? So I don't think it was ever a mystery. And they did constantly talk about that lining up two 747s wingtip to wingtip thing a lot. I think the vast majority of people watching archery, again because you have to go find it so it's not for the Casual viewer, are pretty familiar with the distances. They also did have a pretty cool thing where they had a computer graphic trace the route of the arrow.
Highly highly disagree that it was monotonous though. There's a lot of tension and anticipation to archery in the way they shot it and I think it comes off very well. I mean I was standing up and pacing half the time I watched it. There's a lot of drama in archery.
Show, don’t tell. It’s a visual medium.
I’m referring to the camera work, not the competition.
I believe it actually showed a graphic of that plane thing. And like I said they show the entire course many times.
Well, I disagree. Face, target. Face, target. Face, target. Check the link. That’s not dramatic IMO. Maybe it was just their YouTube videos but it left me wanting. Curling is 100x more dramatic than how they cut the archery footage together.
https://youtu.be/6IsKUb5E030
Oh well shit no wonder you think it's boring. That wasn't the broadcast. That's like a recap highlight reel thing. That's choppy as hell. Yeah if that's what they actually showed I'd agree with you. When you watch the actual event the whole thing it's a lot better. That's not what I saw at all. Also the real announcers were way better. They were actually people who knew archery.