this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
67 points (73.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3815 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Since you have made it very clear that you have no intention to take this discussion or my advice seriously, I’m going to go ahead and end this here as I’ve no intention to exercise futility with disrespectful people who have no intention to even try to understand things they clearly don’t.

Additionally, I don’t engage in political discussions with people that are easily upset by facts. Especially when they respond with made up bullshit.

Lastly, the link I added was done before you responded, as it was done for your benefit. I tried educating you. You’re FAR too influenced by your own belief that seeing what you want and not what is there is easier than facing the truth.

Do better. Be better.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Since you have made it very clear that you have no intention to take this discussion or my advice seriously

I take the discussion seriously, but you're not offering advice. You're unjustly accusing me of profound ignorance because I don't agree with your pro-establishment bias.

I’ve no intention to exercise futility with disrespectful people

Damn, are you going for some kind of hypocrisy merit badge? Because repeatedly and falsely accusing me of knowing nothing about something I in fact know intimately and have for decades and then accusing ME of being disrespectful should earn you that badge for sure!

who have no intention to even try to understand things they clearly don’t

Again with the unearned condescension 🙄

Additionally, I don’t engage in political discussions with people that are easily upset by facts

Well MOST people don't engage in political discussion with themselves so..

I tried educating you

No, you tried to convert me to your pro-establishment way of thinking against my will. That's not education, it's attempted indoctrination.

You’re FAR too influenced by your own belief that seeing what you want and not what is there is easier than facing the truth.

You've already earned your merit badge, you can stop with the glaring hypocrisy and projection.

Do better. Be better.

Right back at you. You FEEL that blindly believing the establishment kayfabe makes you more knowledgeable and overall superior.

It actually makes you gullible, narrow minded and, in your case, more condescending than Jeremy Clarkson explaining the importance of torque in racing cars to a woman.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m guessing the “I’m going to end this here” part didn’t really make much sense to you. Now I think I understand why you didn’t want to read up on everything you have wrong.

Either way, I’m sure you had a lot of fun writing all that out- but I didn’t read anything it. You’ve proven yourself…. Unnecessary.

Best of luck to ya.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m guessing the “I’m going to end this here” part didn’t really make much sense to you

Yeah, I'm not very good at letting others have the last word in general and when they're blatantly lying, I find it much more difficult than otherwise.

Now I think I understand why you didn’t want to read up on everything you have wrong.

I read the article. It was about Biden temporarily pausing part of one weapon shipment several months ago without halting any other before or since. All of which I knew already. None of which I "had wrong".

You’ve proven yourself…. Unnecessary.

REALLY laying it on thick there, pal. You sure you're not overcompensating for something?

Like the fact that you're incapable of forming an independent opinion to the point where you have to pretend that it's impossible?

Best of luck to ya.

I'd say the same, but that would be disingenuous and unlike you, I don't lie to make myself look better.

I hope your day is as pleasant as your conduct in this conversation has been.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago