this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
22 points (72.9% liked)
Diablo
6560 readers
1 users here now
For discussion, memes, and everything Diablo.
Simple rules:
- Diablo related content only. This includes other ARPGs to (and only to) the extent that they relate to Diablo.
- Behave yourself.
- No NSFW content.
- Diablo based memes are allowed in moderation.
Please tag your posts with the game you're talking about: [D4], [D3], [D2], [D2R], etc.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You’re making it sound like I’m spreading the worst conspiracy theory of all time my dude. You didn’t refute it with any evidence btw, you just said it’s pointless and the devs wouldn’t do this. But you had nothing to back it up like I don’t have any to back up mine, hence the “apparently” and the “I haven’t tried this myself”. But you, you are saying that blizzard wouldn’t do this as a 100% fact without saying you’ve tried this out to see if it works. You are doing exactly what you are saying I’m doing yet no where in my post did I say it’s a fact so your whole argument is invalidated by that one simple fact.
You came and attacked my post point blank. You could’ve said something like “I’ve actually tried this but it didn’t seem like it’s a thing”. Instead you wrote an essay on how my post is pointless blah blah blah.
Not really that hard to see in no way in my post am I preaching it like a fact which you seem to be implying. You woke up and chose violence
Could have simply linked this video instead of projecting https://youtube.com/watch?v=3Do1Fkh65mw&feature=sharea
If you shared any type of evidence it would’ve been a good argument, but you didn’t. So here I am shutting this rat theory down in my own post about it because I like to share evidence as I come across it instead of spewing some as a fact without anything to back it up
Agree to disagree 🤝
The burden of proof is on you, not him.
The only thing I’ll say about this is saying that providing evidence for something you claim is 100% is situationally dependent and never 100% required is very disturbing. No matter the situation if someone claims that there should be evidence.
I would love to hear your reasoning on why people can go around spewing something as a undeniable fact without backing it up. I won’t even reply. I just want to see how you justify that. I’m not talking just for this situation, but any situation you think proof isn’t needed so a general sense.