this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
887 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39143 readers
1522 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's not the Olympic organizers' job to disqualify someone based on how immoral, criminal, of poor character or despicable a person is (on who's laws anyway?). This is a major failure on the country's olympic committee selecting these people to represent themselves to the world.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Yet they're more than happy to disqualify and otherwise exclude people based on their biology. Curious.. 🤔

[–] flatlined@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

On the one hand that's supposedly to do with competitive advantage. It makes sense to try to even the playing field, which should have nothing to do with objection on 'moral'grounds. I'd argue this is mostly a good thing given the iffiness of many groups' morals.

Case in point, your exact examples, which brings me to the other hand. Banning trans athletes on 'fairness' grounds is bullshit. In most sports there's no known competitive advantage. Where there's an imbalance they tend to show disadvantage. The rare cases with an advantage for trans athletes tend to disappear the moment you correct for size/weight, which is not something we'd exclude cis athletes for. None of your examples should have happened. They do not hold water on fairness grounds, and any moralistic reasons behind it are reprehensible.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Obviously it's a murky subject on the topic of intersex and transgender athletes participating in the ladies' competition. However on the whole, the focus is on matters related to achieving a fair competition to a sport rather than someone's morality. The IOC, with consultation from a multitude of countries, dropped many of the testosterone and sex testing criteria for this year, where before the 2016 olympics, trans and intersex athletes were barred completely without genital surgery.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Cool, thanks for sharing. I know that the criteria is sketchy at best, but interesting to see where the line is drawn, and how this is still a "problem" that the IOC are facing.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Damn, maybe cis women should git gud instead of being scared of trans folk.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like you would have a physical advantage by being born male. See no issues with transwomen competing with men though. Technically the mens divisions are the "unrestricted" entries.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like that isn't even true and you're just a transphobe and misogynist.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Pretty interesting read, but far from conclusive. As they said in the study. 15-23 random people from each group gathered from social media isn't exactly what I would call bulletproof. Just by going through male puberty you would have a physical advantage by being taller.

[–] amanda@aggregatet.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but how did they end up selecting him and why can’t they recall him?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

That is a very good question and quite shameful for the Dutch Olympic Committee that they did not.