this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
376 points (100.0% liked)

196

16423 readers
1698 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rule 1

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hopps@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unless we get fusion and/or general AI... Yup.

[–] outdated_belated@vlemmy.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Under the current / capitalist mode of production, probably especially if, tbh

[–] Hopps@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't put it past this timeline, that's for sure

[–] Silverstrings@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I promise you we don't need fusion just to survive, we just need better policies. Please don't give up.

[–] Hopps@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that at any point we could have dealt with it, but greed seems to be preventing that to the point that we may need a miracle tech breakthrough that is so great, that fixing this issue would be trivial.

[–] Silverstrings@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dealing with climate change isn't a binary either/or thing, there's a huge range of potential outcomes we could fall into. Suffice to say that the more we do to reduce pollution now the better things will be in the future, even if we've missed our chance to completely avoid significant warming. We've only barely invested in renewable energy and it's still having a massive impact on emissions.

[–] Hopps@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree, we are still making important renewable advancements that are being used more and more.