this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
77 points (97.5% liked)

Europe

1520 readers
582 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
federalreverse@feddit.org
poVoq@slrpnk.net
anzo@programming.dev
77
Germany's Green party demands right to work from home - especially for women (www.marketscreener.com)
submitted 3 months ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Greens in Germany have demanded that Labor Minister Hubertus Heil (Social Democrats) give women in particular the right to work from home. "Working from home is particularly important for women in order to reconcile family and career," said labor market politician Beate MΓΌller-Gemmeke (Greens) to the "Tagesspiegel" in Berlin. It's about time sovereignty and when you work, how long and where.

The background to this is a debate about the return from the home office to the office at companies such as SAP or Deutsche Bank. The coalition agreement already stipulates that employees should have the right to work from home in future. However, this depends on the respective profession. This goal has not yet been implemented.

Labor Minister Heil has so far only presented initial non-binding recommendations on occupational health and safety for hybrid VDU work. This is not enough for the Greens. The party is therefore calling for further protection of the right to work from home.

There has also been criticism from the trade unions. Daniel Gimpel, trade union secretary at Verdi, regrets that the project has been shelved: "The fundamental aim in future must be to enable self-determined mobile working from home."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 27 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Even though I agree that it predominantly affects women who have to reconcile work and family, why do we need to exclude men from it? I stayed with our son for over one year when he was between 2 months and 1 year and 4 months. I'm the one working from home and taking care of him here especially when he can't go to the day care. It's me who is shifting most of the work to afternoon and evening. And I'm his dad, I'm also stressed that one day some people will not be OK with me doing it, even though I deliver everything on time.

But anyway, this is all hypothetical because I live in South Korea where all of this is even more extreme. But who knows, perhaps some day we will move back to Germany.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Gonna post this as a reply here so I won't have to copy this 3 times. Also tagging ValiantDust@feddit.org 0x815@feddit.org Enkrod@feddit.org so they see this as well

The original article by the tagespiegel uses language that makes it explicit this is supposed to include men however their motivation for demanding this (equal) home office right is because women are disproportionally affected by the lack of a right to home office work. The marketscreener article has translated this quite badly imo.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@ValiantDust@feddit.org @0x815@feddit.org and @Enkrod@feddit.org won't see your tags the way you posted it, so here.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not it curiously actually worked for me, but thank you.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Huh, really? How interesting. They show up to me as email links.

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

They don't show up as links at all for me, but I still got a notification for a mention. I was also surprised that it worked. Might depend on the app or the instance though. But thank you anyway.

[–] 0x815@feddit.org 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As far as I know, men are not excluded (others may correct me if I am mistaken). The Greens may have said that exactly because women are more affected by this issue as you said, but I don't think men are excluded from the right. This would also violate the equality principle imho (but I am not a lawyer, so take this with a pinch of salt).

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

This is populism though, as the main reason women are disproportionally affected is because they more often work in low paying service jobs that can't be shifted to home-office easily.

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I might be missing some additional information but I don't think men are excluded. I think the Greens are just making an additional point how it's especially important to women. I haven't read anything that suggests only women should have the right to work from home.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The argument is that it's especially important for women, but everyone should get it. German law will not see this implemented for only one gender. They are making the argument about women working from home for two reasons:

  1. Virtue Signaling to a base that is especially concerned with the systemic disadvantage for women. (In this case virtue signaling is not a bad thing, because it mobilizes voters)
  2. Because the governing coalition is centre-left the Greens are framing it in a way to sell it to the conservative opposition. For years the conservatives have been arguing about how we have too few kids in Germany and how it's because women prioritize their career. So this is good framing to onboard some opposition votes in parliament.