this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
132 points (95.8% liked)

News

23276 readers
4465 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 112 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The failed deal comes after the Army National Guard blew $88 million on a deal with NASCAR, that also yielded 20 recruits, according to USA Today.

I can't help but feel 88 million could possibly be used for other personnel retention efforts, which might help the fact that every veteran, positive or negative about the US, will tell you the same goddamn thing - don't join, because the military doesn't give a fuck about your wellbeing.

[–] mars296@fedia.io 68 points 3 months ago

They could have had over 4x the effectiveness by simply offering 88 18-yearolds $1 million dollars each to enlist.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 52 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It was $88M for 0 recruits, per that USA Today article:

The Guard received 24,800 recruiting prospects from the program in 2012, documents show. In those cases, potential recruits indicated the NASCAR affiliation prompted them to seek more information about joining. Of that group, only 20 met the Guard's qualifications for entry into the service, and not one of them joined.

The $88M was National Guard spending on nascar from 2011-13. The 20 recruits who made the right choice were just in 2012, but the military.com article that daily beast is reporting on says 'potentially no recruits' when describing the whole nascar deal.

The craziest part to me is the 25k prospects yielding 20 qualified candidates. 99.92% were unfit for service.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

2012, butThe craziest part to me is the 25k prospects yielding 20 qualified candidates. 99.92% were unfit for service.

Well they did advertise at NASCAR.....

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

No sir, for the 215th time you cannot already have a pacemaker. Next!

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

99.92% were unfit for service.

It's that strict conservative diet of pork cracklin's, copenhagen and budweiser.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -4 points 3 months ago

I wonder what the reasons were. Probably some had allergies or some minor shit like that. With the amount of waivers these days, there's probably only 20 people in the military who are actually fit for service

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 17 points 3 months ago

Yeah, seriously. Word of mouth is stronger than advertising, and its very negative for the military

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

If they spend that $88 million on actually providing the benefits they promised it would have been not wasteful in the first place but also would have gotten more recruits.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago

Yes, but it is recruits that they're desperate for.