politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It's quite easy to explain. Republicans have retreated into their own media bubble, where they can mold their own reality based on "alternative facts". Their end goal is to project their reality onto the world and give it substance. In this bubble world, Donald Trump is the Alpha Male, and JD Vance is the everyman who speaks for the people.
Outside this bubble, though, Trump is a narcissist and criminal, and JD Vance is severely out of touch. The only way to penetrate this bubble is to shove the truth through it until it pops. Sometimes, calling things as they are doesn't get through the bubble, because it immediately puts people on the defensive about their choices. But call them weird? They might agree something a little weird is going on, and that might be just the opening to stick the truth in there.
I think this is why the Republicans seem weirdly upset by this line of attack. Call them fascists, they don't bat an eye. It's too complicated for their base to comprehend anyway, even if the would have had a problem with it. But call them out for being weird, and suddenly their base might stop for a moment and actually think: "Yeah, writing about fucking a sofa in your memoirs is a bit odd, isn't it?"
Exactly. For the longest time Democrats have suffered from the "bumper sticker gap." Liberal and leftist positions are generally more complex, nuanced and tend to require a broader intellectual background than conservative positions. This means they aren't easily captured by sound bites, and that makes it much easier for conservatives to capture and control media narratives.
"Republicans are weird" closes that gap, and carries a whole lot of deeper context in the form of the obvious response - "why are Republicans weird?" Suddenly there's an inroad to engage with deeper policy conversations. And better yet, Republicans can't engage with the topic at all without having the same conversation - "we aren't weird because..."
You're aware this never happened right?
The AP couldn't prove he didn't fuck a couch. So you sound a little too confident to me.
Yes it's so funny that it's fully worth sinking to their level to make so shit up and then never shut up about it ever /s
Damn dude, touch grass.
Did you delete this because you realized you're wrong or lying wasn't worth it?
Wrong guy. Surprised anyone saw it, I deleted it within seconds.
Got it. Yeah I never said anything like that. I think we should talk more about Trump's fascist statements if anything. In my client it still shows deleted comments, you just have to click an extra time to see the content.
If I knew that was an option I'd have edited it first.
Yeah I've never been outside before because I think the left should be better than this shit. I probably have never seen a woman naked too or something right
The right should be better than this shit, too, but here we are. Until the truth matters to them again, you have to attack them in ways that will actually work.
This joke is the best thing to happen to Ohio in decades. Might get us another Democrat in the senate
...how do you figure that?
He’s increasingly unpopular here
I'm not sure how much of that is the joke or how much Lemmy gives us a glimpse of Ohioans' attitudes. I visited Ohio recently and I came away thinking "good God this is basically Northern Florida!"
Edit: oh maybe you meant in Ohio by "here". If so, I'm wondering if you're in a city in Ohio.
I work in a factory in rural Ohio. I’ve been an Ohioan for most of my life. Yeah it’s basically Florida, but as it stands Senator Vance is being seen as increasingly clown shoes. I don’t think he’s going to shift Ohioan values, I think he’s going to be unable to maintain the enthusiasm necessary to hold his seat. Ohio is north Florida, except we were a swing state longer.
Thanks for your perspective here. I hope what you're seeing reflects the rest of the rural parts of the state!
Correction: He didn't write about it in his book, but why if he has never made sweet love to a couch, has he not come forward to deny these sofa-fucking allegations?
Curious...
He didn’t fuck his recliner or his box spring and mattress either, but no one is talking about that.
But how can we be sure?
You must be joking but I'll say it: it's too stupid to address
Ah shoot, you're right, I didn't fact check properly.
Still a massive weirdo though.
Still, people are saying he did.
Trump supporters just have small minds; it's why they have been conned by trump to begin with. Concepts such as "liberty" and "civil rights" are too complex to explain and champion to them. Instead they understand only primitive things, like "weird" and "ugly".
"Don't you think he looks tired?"
This Doctor Who reference is exactly what I have been thinking!
One of my favorite things to watch is to see Jordan Klepper or someone from TYT doing their man on the street thing and asking some of the more radical elements some rather basic, but pointed, questions.
These people are a product of that bubble you reference and you get to see the bubble popped in real time, although I don't think they are fully aware of what is happening.