this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
750 points (98.6% liked)

News

23399 readers
4584 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

THE SENATE UNANIMOUSLY passed a bipartisan bill to provide recourse to victims of porn deepfakes — or sexually-explicit, non-consensual images created with artificial intelligence

The legislation, called the Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits (DEFIANCE) Act — passed in Congress’ upper chamber on Tuesday.  The legislation has been led by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), as well as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in the House.

The legislation would amend the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) to allow people to sue those who produce, distribute, or receive the deepfake pornography, if they “knew or recklessly disregarded” the fact that the victim did not consent to those images.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is this just "AI porn bill" because that's the most common way of doing it these days? I should expect the product is what's being sanctioned and not the method.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not just AI…

…any intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual created through the use of software, machine learning, artificial intelligence, or any other computer-generated or technological means….

This probably also covers using MS Paint.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Back to my hand drawn stick figure celebrity porn, I suppose.

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

As long as it can't be mistaken for the actual person it moves the stigma from them doing weird things to the artist doing weird things

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I was going to ask the same thing. Is a hand-drawn picture illegal?

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

From the text of the bill:

The term ‘digital forgery’ means any intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual created through the use of software, machine learning, artificial intelligence, or any other computer-generated or technological means, including by adapting, modifying, manipulating, or altering an authentic visual depiction, that, when viewed as a whole by a reasonable person, is indistinguishable from an authentic visual depiction of the individual.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unless you use a digital pen.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

No, because if you use a digital pen it still has to meet the threshold of being indistinguishable from the real thing

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks. So photorealistic paintings are still legal, although I suppose they're not a big problem in practice. It's still weird that the method of creation matters, although "any other technological means" is pretty broad. Are paintbrushes a technology? Does using a digital camera to photograph a painting count as creating a visual depiction?

I'm vaguely worried about the first-amendment implications.

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

I think it comes down to the last part - indistinguishable by a reasonable person as an authentic visual depiction. That'll be up to courts to decide, but I think a painting would be pretty obviously not an authentic visual depiction.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

This bill targets digital (computer made or altered) forgeries. Not hand-drawn sketches.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 4 months ago

No, it criminalizes anything created involving a computer that is realistic-looking.