this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
511 points (98.3% liked)

News

22854 readers
4875 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Even before President Joe Biden’s long-speculated withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race, allies of former President Donald Trump floated the possibility of suing to block Democrats from having anyone other than Biden on the ballot in November

But election administration and legal experts said the timing of Biden’s exit on Sunday makes it unlikely that any Republican ballot access challenges will succeed, with some calling the idea “ridiculous” and “frivolous.” Democrats are on safe legal ground as they identify a new standard-bearer, they say, because the party hasn’t officially chosen its nominee. That typically occurs with a vote of delegates at the party’s convention. 

It’s ridiculous for people to talk about ‘replacing Biden.’ He hasn’t been nominated yet,” said Richard Winger, a leading expert on state ballot access laws and the longtime editor of the “Ballot Access News” newsletter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 148 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They absolutely have no legal basis, my only worry is that they have activists in SCOTUS which showed us multiple times that they don't care what the Constitution says.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly.

It used to be the case that sane people with a modicum of understanding of our government/legal system, or even the ability to do a bit of research, they could just laugh this off.

But uh, nope, now we live in corrupt/activist Supreme Court era, which throws out decades of precedent and functionally invents new laws as it pleases.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What I love about Clarence Thomas is he is giving us the road map to oppressive systems we have to take down. He has observed the unspoken rules and has codified them into law with his rulings. When Clarence gets exorbitant gifts for his influence it's not because he's greedy, we'll it is, but it's also him saying, "these are the rules, I get rewarded because I have the seat of power."

Clarence is not a secret freedom fighter but he might as well be because he is shining a light and exposing the ugliness that is our judicial system.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Historically speaking, we Americans usually ignore what the SCOTUS says. Virginia was practically segregated into the early 1970s, for example, well over a decade after Brown v Board of Education.

That's the hilarious part of the SCOTUS. They kind of don't matter.


The response to an unjust SCOTUS is to ignore them. Like what are they actually gonna do about it?

[–] HoustonHenry@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Only works if everyone ignores them, don't see that happening

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Step 1 of the plan is to at least make people aware of the plan.

There's more options available than expanding the court or whatever. Ultimately, the reigns of power largely rest in Congress and the President. Supreme Court is the moral center, they're only effective if people believe their judgements to be moral and just. Otherwise, their statements are just fancy words on a piece of obscure paper.

Supreme Court has no ability to write laws or enforce them.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Idk I like the idea of expanding the court.

Preferably vertically, using a rack.

[–] rainynight65@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

You might want to talk to some people affected by the SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

There may be an issue with Ohio. The deadline for getting on the ballot the is like 2 days before the DNC, and we won't officially know who the nominee will be until after the convention.