this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
1266 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Non-paywall link: 12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-mock-donald-trump-as-too-old-to-runlike-he-did-to-joe-biden?ref=home?ref=home

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago (3 children)

He's always been too old to run. It's completely ridiculous that he would go after his opponent for something that he is as well without a hint of irony.

He could shame others for having a pot on their head while he has multiple pots on his head and his voters wouldn't be able to see the farce.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It was always just about image. Trump has a bunch of other bad things to talk about and he doesn't show age as a problem as clearly as Biden does. Not to say there haven't been moments where Trump has had moments like Biden but the focus has always been on the other bad aspects of Trump. The reason they focus on it with Biden is because he doesn't really have much else interesting going on for the media to focus on instead.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Watch an interview of Trump in the 80s, after 9/11, and anything that gets put out now. A lot more controlled in the 80s, far more coherent train of thought in the 2000s, and neither of those things now.

He wasn't any less of a terrible person back then, but the veneer hadn't worn off.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I'm still amazed him getting 9/11 mixed up with 7/11 didn't end his career

[–] Snowflake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

One big concern is he has golfers spine. That's why it looks like he's wearing a diaper full of shit when standing. It's a serious concern as he may even need spinal surgery as bad as it looks. Has he even been checked by a spinal professional?

[–] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

What's the point... Trump has no spine.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Many people are saying its both. Full diaper and he needs spinal surgery. He should probably just drop out right now.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I would think with access to the best medical care on the planet, (for free even on our dime), he's been checked by someone competent. It's just that you can't fix everything. And at his age, it's probably not worth the risks that might be involved.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Basically, my adhd brethren: Biden boring, but old and shows it. Trump not boring, just dumb, and shows age less often.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Could we do a boot instead?

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's a preemptive strike. Haven't you noticed that when Trump has done something wrong, he immediately and viciously attacks his opponent for doing that thing. That's true even if the thing is being old. If you make a list of things Trump has accused others of, you'll notice quickly that he did many of those things. So many, in fact, that it will make you wonder if he's done those other things too.

He constantly accused Cruz of being a liar. He said Hilary was corrupt, racist, unstable, and that Russia wanted her to be president. He accused Obama and Biden of election tampering. It goes on and on. They say it's projection, but I think it's a calculated move to make the other people sound like they're saying "No, you are."