this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
94 points (95.2% liked)
Games
16382 readers
940 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No. They think they can purposefully release a half assed game after promising something entirely different and then drip feed the previously removed content over the years while fixing the purposefully introduced bugs in order to be praised as heroes by gullible simps.
That is already the standard but without the redemption. That's what people applaud here. That they invested in it and not abandoning it.
You clearly need to work on your reading comprehension because no, that is absolutely not the standard already. I'm literally describing an example of literal fraud.
Clearly...
Feel free to give me some example games that removed content before the release, added intentional bugs and then drip fed the removed content back in while "fixing" the intentional bugs for their image. If it is the standard already I'm sure you should have an entire list ready to prove me wrong.
Not everyone is intentionally shitty.
Just the majority.