this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
189 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3767 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The Speaker of the House couldn't make a speech due to a teleprompter breakdown. It's not a minor thing. If it happened to the President it would be in the news for weeks.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 38 points 4 months ago

This begs the question: can Mike Johnson function without someone telling him what to say? And who's telling him what to say anyway? The oil industry? The Chinese? Obama?

Mike needs to answer voters' questions about why he can't function without someone feeding him the words. It's either that or step down. More and more people are asking that recently.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Refinement to your claim: if it happened to President Biden, it would be in the news for weeks. If it happened to Trump as president or any other Republican for that matter, nothing. They could all fall into a trance of aphasic racist gibberish and the reporting would be on how big the crowd was.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Well then that settles it, replace him with AI with speech synthesis. Probably would have less hallucinations too.

Edit: the SotH I mean

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I vote for either Glados or Shodan, as I think the country needs strong leadership that can adapt to an ever changing situation.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

This next test is to determine the US public's voting skills. Option 1 is a companion cube. Option 2 is a tank of deadly neurotoxin.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe something a little less mass murdery?

Like the AI they replaced Al Gore with? 🤷

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I can not think of anything that means nothing more than this.

He's there to read some words, the words disappeared, he was unable to read them. How in the world are you imagining this to be anything at all?

It shouldn't be news if this happens to anyone, including the president. This is not news. This is a tech malfunction.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact: words said or not said by politicians in high office often have far-reaching consequences.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He was simply introducing the next speaker. What "far-reaching consequences" might this have?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I dunno, stuff? And junk like that? 🤷

Your original comment made it sound like words are inherently inconsequential, which couldn't be further from the truth.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

Gotcha. I am not sharing the same reality or maybe not discussing the same story as you. Understood.