this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
105 points (97.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40189 readers
708 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
105
What do you prefer to selfhost? (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by erev@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been around selfhosting most of my life and have seen a variety of different setups and reasons for selfhosting. For myself, I don't really self host as mant services for myself as I do infrastructure. I like to build out the things that are usually invisible to people. I host some stuff that's relatively visible, but most of my time is spent building an over engineered backbone for all the services I could theoretically host. For instance, full domain authentication and oversight with kerberized network storage, and both internal and public DNS.

The actual services I host? Mail and vaultwarden, with a few (i.e. < 3) more to come.

I absolutely do not need the level of infrastructure I need, but I honestly prefer that to the majority of possible things I could host. That's the fun stuff to me; the meat and potatoes. But I know some people do focus more on the actual useful services they can host, or on achieving specific things with their self hosting. What types of things do you host and why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you email to people on gmail or outlook, won't Google and Microsoft still end up with copies of most of your mail?

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 5 points 4 months ago

Yes, but at the very least they have to do queries to build that profile out across dozens or hundreds of recipients... And they only get what I explicitly sent to them/their users.

Google collects 100% of the emails you're getting on gmail and it's already sent directly to you... so they see it completely... including emails being sent to other sources since it originates from their server (so collecting information that would be going to an MS Exchange server as well...).

Self hosting this means that you're collecting your own shit... And companies can only get the outgoing side to their users. And never the full picture of your systems/emails.

This matters a lot more than you think. Lots of systems for automation sends through systems like Mailchimp, PHPmailer, etc... So those emails from your doctor likely never originated from MS or Google to begin with. When it hits your inbox on Gmail or Outlook... Well now it's on their system. Now they can analyze it.