this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
833 points (99.3% liked)

Uplifting News

11404 readers
487 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://kbin.run/m/technology@lemmy.ml/t/553659

A decline in fossil fuel power is now ‘inevitable’, the report's authors say.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why? Cars will go away when cities are redesigned to make them unnecessary/inconvenient. Otherwise electric cars don't care where energy comes from.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the point they're making is electric technology / batteries haven't been very good until recently, so we'd have a lot fewer cars out there if we didn't have fossils fuels in the first place since they can store more energy than batteries.

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The counter argument, and I'm not saying this is correct, is that we had electric cars over a hundred years ago:

"Over the next few years, electric vehicles from different automakers began popping up across the U.S. New York City even had a fleet of more than 60 electric taxis. By 1900, electric cars were at their heyday, accounting for around a third of all vehicles on the road. During the next 10 years, they continued to show strong sales."

https://www.energy.gov/articles/history-electric-car

If we had pursued the electric car at the same rate we pursued advances in ICE engines, perhaps they would have been better by now. They made resurgences in the 70s and 80s during the energy crisis in the west.

Clearly burning hyrdo-carbon rich fuels was easier, but it's hard to say how much the pursuit of fossil fuel driven vehicles and machinery was influenced by both momentum, and the manipulation and interference of the fossil fuel industry. It's possible that we could have had electric cars and still all the of the traffic, infrastructure and urban societal issues that we do today.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

We had the opportunity. Remember the EV1?

Big oil got scared and convinced GM to scrap the entire EV line and set EV innovations back by a fucking decade

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yep, I agree! Just saying I think that's what the original question was about. Seems like an interesting question to ask.