this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
540 points (97.0% liked)

Atheist Memes

5577 readers
35 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DARbarian@kbin.run 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

How do the Jewish Torah and Talmud fare? Are there much more authoritative texts for those and the Quran?

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The first Qur'an was written within two years of Muhammads death. The Qur'an was standardized under caliph Uthman several years later, and all other copies were ordered to be burned or buried, or however one would respectfully retire a holy book. The closest English word for Qur'an is generally regarded to be 'recitations', as it was not originally meant to be a text. So, to maintain the integrity of the Suras (chapters, sort of), each one was required to be verified by multiple independent witnesses. Written Arabic was even elaborated to include information about how it was to be read (literally read aloud, not interpreted).

The relative speed with which this all occurred meant that some of these sources were indeed very close to Muhammad during his life. His wife A'i'sha, for example. Still, you can raise doubts by pointing out that the Suras may not have survived oral transmission fully in-tact, or that changes may have occurred over the 20+ year gap between Muhammads death and it's final transcription, and indeed many scholars do. I believe there is some degree of variation in manuscripts and sources.

But the general view among believers is that the Qur'an is the literal, unadulterated word of God, and we know that great care was taken to preserve it.

Not an expert, just took an Intro to the Qur'an course.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is very interesting thank you. The inherent problem is that faithfully transcribed bullshit is still bullshit.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

if anything religiously motivated future scholars are more likely to reinterpret texts in a favorable light, "oh I'm sure God actually meant 'this'"...

look at trump's transcripts vs maga's recollection of his speeches and already they sound a lot better

[–] DARbarian@kbin.run 2 points 4 months ago

Thank you so much for such a detailed answer!

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 7 points 4 months ago

I recently started listening to a podcast called Data Over Dogma. They talk about some various similarities and differences in various scriptures/manuscripts. It's pretty neat.