Asklemmy

43810 readers

1581 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Should poverty ever be a defence against a charge of shoplifting? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by tomasz@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BlackLotus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes, always. Shoplifting from anything but a good worker-owned enterprise is entirely supportable assuming it's not just like a mom and pop with zero employees other than the mom and pop.

The entire existence of capitalism is tightly coupled with mass worker exploitation through the theft of the surplus value generated by workers.

Edit: I don't even care if they aren't in poverty, I still support them, especially from trash like Target.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

If a person needs to resort to stealing essential supplies, they're not a failure, it's society that's failing.