this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
680 points (98.4% liked)

Atheist Memes

5578 readers
4 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Kind of, but not really. Look at France, they have freedom from religion. They're not allowed to be religious fanatics in public. It's why they banned the burkini.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, if they ban only Islamic religious symbols but not crosses, bhindis, or yarmulkes then they’re just punching down on a vulnerable and powerless minority. A society is only as good as it treats its most vulnerable, otherwise their culture is “might is right”, which isn’t a culture per se.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

France managed this by forbiding all religious displays of any kind in any public place, unless it's over 200+ years old then it's protected for being a historical display. Nothing outside of Catholicism has any display that old. Bing bang boom, only Catholic displays of a religious nature are allowed.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think you missed the forest through the trees on that one. I agree that you can't half ass it though.

[–] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Come on over to my neck of the woods....Conservatives are cutting all the trees down in clear-cuts.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They’re not allowed to be religious fanatics in public.

Oh they very much are. As long as it's christian.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You're also missing the forest through the trees.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You’re also missing the forest through the trees.

This is the sort of thing someone says when they really don't know what to say but want to sound like they have Very Profound Thoughts.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Okay, since you need it spelled out... France may not have appropriately applied its freedom from religion, but that isn't the point. The point is a country like France doesn't just have freedom from a religious state, but also extends that further, and that's the part we (the US) are missing. You got hung up on the detail instead of paying attention to the meaning I was conveying, hence missing the forest through the trees. There is nothing profound about it at all, just saying you're looking far too deeply instead of looking at the bigger picture of what was said.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

You got hung up on the detail instead of paying attention to the meaning I was conveying

Ima thinking what we have here is a failure to communicate, not so much a failure to understand.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then it sounds like they don't have freedom from religion or freedom of religion. So I still don't get what you think the issue is.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't have the patience to hold your hand and explain what an example is. Good luck with figuring things out in life.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As if a country not having FfR or FoR is a useful "example" here.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good luck with figuring out things in life.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good luck making coherent claims

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

It helps if you're my target audience. That's people who know what an example is.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No I think they made a really good point that you are ignoring because it doesn't suit your narrative.

When countries ban minority faiths they effectively reward the majority one.

You can have freedom from religion without abolishing religion.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That would be a good point of France wasn't just an example. I'm not saying to emulate them exactly.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How about people are allowed to believe what they want? You know fucking freedom

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I don't disagree with that. Believe what you want. Freedom from religion wouldn't stop you from believing what you want. It stops you from pushing it onto others.