this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
201 points (97.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35810 readers
1914 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wouldn't it cut down on search queries (and thus save resources) if I could search for "this is my phrase" rather than rawdogging it as an unbound series of words, each of which seems to be pulling up results unconnected to the other words in the phrase?

There are only 2 reasons I can think of why a website's search engine lacks this incredibly basic functionality:

  1. The site wants you to spend more time there, seeing more ads and padding out their engagement stats.
  2. They're just too stupid to know that these sorts of bare-bones search engines are close to useless, or they just don't think it's worth the effort. Apathetic incompetence, basically.

Is there a sound financial or programmatic reason for running a search engine which has all the intelligence of a turnip?

Cheers!

EDIT: I should have been a bit more specific: I'm mainly talking about search engines within websites (rather than DDG or Google). One good example is BitTorrent sites; they rarely let you define exact phrases. Most shopping websites, even the behemoth Amazon, don't seem to respect quotation marks around phrases.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I know at least duckduckgo says on their syntax page that they're aware that operator usage isn't perfect on their site. Seems to come from the fact that they pull results from multiple sources

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (5 children)

DDG, because they’re so heavily reliant on bing, has gone to absolute shit recently. I’m just about to quit them. Every link in the top ten goes to some M$N / microsoft-adjacent garbage.

[–] Bluefruit@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh so its not just me who thinks its gotten worse then. I was starting to go a little crazy man. It seems like its slowly gottwn worse over time. I wonder if its due to the amount of ai content messing up seo ratings or something

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Not just you, no. Microsoft has just gone nuts with their overreach and DDG appears to be collateral damage. After ? A long time of being fine for 90% of what I needed.

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Duckduckgo is awful at searching for specific memes I need. Sometimes I only remember the text and a rough description of the image, but DDG seems only to consider images with Impact TOP TEXT BOTTOM TEXT captions to be memes. I switch to Google and I find the one I want instantly. If there was a way to have the image results of Google with the web results of DDG my life would be complete

[–] Tixanou@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If there was a way to have the image results of Google with the web results of DDG my life would be complete

You might want to look into 4get and SearXNG

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, after some years of DDG getting worse I finally dropped them. I switched to Brave and it's surprisingly decent for an independent search engine. If you search for something that they don't have good results for they'll ask you if you want to get anonymous results from google as well, which means I don't usually have to switch search engines for harder results.

They do seem to have a much lower number of image results though.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why? I've never used it, so not disagreeing, but that seems a pretty strong reaction to a search engine.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

it's more about the browser and by extension the brand, not so much about the search engine per se.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh ok - is the browser dodgy in some way? I'm not familiar with it.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

over the years, too many to count. for me the first red flag was them trying to replace ads with their own "safe" ads, rather than blocking them. they have brave rewards, which i automatically distrust. they push crypto, which is probably their biggest sin. but they also auto added affiliate links to binance urls. just all around shitty, opportunistic goblin vibes.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Jeepers. Will steer well clear, thanks!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

every day it looks more and more clear that we're gonna have no choice but pay for kagi if we want to find anything worth a fuck on the internet

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That’s the conclusion I keep coming to as well, and its kind of sad.

[–] Flightbird386@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I use -msn , which seems to help somewhat

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I believe they’ve said that explicit operators are much more expensive to serve than a regular search, so that’s probably why they don’t respect them. Especially a - operator.