politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Factually not true...
The DNC can rewrite the rules before the convention and nominate anyone they want.
As their lawyers have told judges, they're a private organization that can name anyone as the candidate. That was their defense for accusations that they already rig primaries.
Literally anyone that becomes the Dem nominee will have nationwide name recognition in 24 hours.
The most common reason for voting Biden is "to stop trump" so any replacement shares the most important quality Dem voters want that Biden actually meets.
Like, sure, this would have been so much easier if we had an actual primary and the people closest to Biden hadn't spent four years hiding him and lying about his mental capabilities. But they didn't. They kept repeating it was too late for anyone except Biden.
They're still saying it, but it's still not true.
Good points. However, I would argue that the DNC would absolutely fuck up picking a new nominee. They would pick some “centrist” unlikeable democrat that would try to appeal to a moderate middle that just doesn’t exist. They would run a flaccid campaign and manage to piss off everybody trying to appeal to everybody. Republicans would absolutely capitalize on the chaos.
In before they nominate fucking Hillary... again. It would be one thing to claim name recognition if people actually liked Biden, but nobody fucking likes Biden. People stomach Biden because the alternative is so much worse. This is why we so desperately need some kind of proportional voting system, literally any kind. The public needs a way of telling the parties "here's how we feel about these issues" without it being a binary choice between bad and even worse.
Ranked choice voting starts at home. o7
We've got a few peeking it, but it's going to take a lot of grassroots effort for it to become universal and nationwide
Right
Biden appointed Jamie Harrison, it's very very unlikely that Jamie Harrison nominates anyone else. And if he does, it will be another moderate that names Jamie Harrison head of the DNC again.
Because the people running the DNC care more about personal political power than stopping trump.
Just like the problem with republicans isn't just trump, it's the people behind the scenes that also need addressed.
The problem with the DNC isn't just Biden, it's the people Biden put in charge of the DNC.
The party can't survive without the voters, we're the important part.
If the DNC refuses to acknowledge that, it won't be the first time voters left a party behind to die without them.
At a certain point the corruption is bad enough we need to start over. It won't be easy, but at a certain point it's the only option.
Be that as it may, with the stakes in this upcoming election, now is (to my deep frustration and chagrin) absolutely not the time.
Okay but... worse than Biden is already doing?
At this point is there anyone, anyone at all, who isn't merely voting for "not Trump" on the "left"?
Conversely, there are a few on the right who actively like Trump.
And there may be a handful of people - in key spots though - who may vote for a younger candidate?
They had a primary in 2020.
Biden won.
When was the last time there were primaries for a party with an incumbent president?
States only had primarys if they were legally required to.
I’m taking about 2020.
When was the last time we had a dicking potato running the country? It's like everything we're seeing now is the Biden that's always been, and that's what the DNC chose to push on us
We don’t have a potato running the country.
Unfortunately he’s not even that good
He’s amazing compared to the competition.
We should be concentrating on getting a young nominee in for the next election.
I heard that 8 years ago, then 4 years ago, right now, and I’m sure I will hear it again in another 4 years I’m sure.
Instead of being negative, look into the candidates and donate to the ones your like, advocate for them and volunteer your time to their campaigns.
Help with the change you want to see.
Liberal should elect Trump and push him left after the election
This is how I know you’re having a good faith discussion and not trolling.
That's the bullshit that liberals claimed they would do in 2020 with Biden and never did. So here we are
Biden’s had some bad policies but he’s had much more good ones.
Why would that be easier with Trump?
I’m stealing this
Did we not watch the same debate?
I get it, you dislike Biden.
I dislike all POS politicians that serve capital.
Your post is not true dude. They cannot rewrite the rules like that. Any changes they make would not take effect until the next election.
Listen. Biden is not going to step out. Anyone saying that this is a likely scenario is flat out delusional and has no idea what they are talking about, or they are a Trump supporter trying to sew chaos.
The DNC does not control the Biden/Harris 2024 campaign org, the Biden/Harris ground ops teams including 30 Biden/Harris campaign offices in Michigan alone, the Biden/Harris war chest containing over $100 million, or the Biden/Harris Super PACS.
Biden/Harris can take their ball and go home. And that's why the DNC won't replace Biden unless he willingly steps down.
Apart from money and a functioning campaign organization. But who needs that if you're young, right?
The DNC is an organization stacked with Joe Biden loyalists. And that's before discussing the fucked vibes of an 11th hour rules rewrite on the eve of what was supposed to be a lay-up nomination. Weeks of people arguing over who gets handed the Prez nod without a single primary vote cast in their name would be an absolute disaster.
Yes, the DNC can change the rules whenever they want. But when your party is supposed to be putting a priority on Protecting Democracy, it's a bad look to then say "Yeah, we held a bunch of uncontested elections which we are now ignoring the result of".
You're missing the context...
They've been saying they don't need to abide by the will of the voters because they're a private party.
And they're right
So when they say they can't use their power to give voters want they want because they're impartial...
It's obviously bullshit.
They're going to do what they want