this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
335 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

31991 readers
842 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the browser, i didn't login in the google account, and I didn't accept the cookies on that site. Using privacybadger that supposedly should block the 3rd party spyware like that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hagar@lemmy.ml 196 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
  1. Install UBlock Origin
  2. Click the extension's icon
  3. Click the gears icon for settings
  4. Open the "My filters" tab
  5. Add a line with ||accounts.google.com/gsi/iframe/select?*

Steps 2 and 3 can be replaced by going to about:addons, finding UBlock Origin, clicking the ... button and selecting "Preferences".

[–] missphant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 107 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

As an additional note this rule is already included in either EasyList – Other Annoyances or AdGuard – Popup Overlays. I recommend just enabling either full category for a more usable internet.

[–] hagar@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 months ago

I can't seem to block them by just enabling annoyances blocks on my end.

"EasyList – Other Annoyances" has this:

! Google signin popup
###credential_picker_container
###credential_picker_iframe

"AdGuard – Popup Overlays" has this:

! Warning: check, if auth using Google is not broken
||accounts.google.com/gsi/client^$third-party,script,domain=<several specific domains here>

My impression is that the rules want to avoid breaking Google sign-in completely, which this rule may do.

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

It must be the former because I have the latter enabled and still see them