Intrigued by the fact that many Bibliogram/Nitter/Invidious/Piped instances are from sites that also offer other services, I set out with good will to sift through them one by one, and here are the results: (and I must say I discovered many instances that are not indexed on the “official” directories).

Obviously if I missed any I will point them out and add them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Strange that there isn't any privacy front-end for Facebook.

[–] y78fpXvK8Zxz@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

considering that they sent a cease and desist letter to the developer of an instagram client, i'm not surprised that facebook doesn't have any.

[–] octt@feddit.it 5 points 2 years ago

Just avoid using their name anywhere, going as far as having an interactive script for when someone wants to compile from source that asks "what is the domain of the worst social network site ever?" You answer "facebook.com", the script replaces some placeholder text with the actual domain in every source file

I'm not joking either, the only reason they have the legal right to C&D these projects is because they are using trademarked names without consent

[–] yourliftingfriend@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm still heartbroken about Barinsta. I use Instagram solely to interact with friends and artists who cling to it, but don't upload there myself. It was perfect, and they had to go and ruin it. I have to wonder if Frost is on Meta's hitlist as well.

[–] noodlejetski@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Frost is basically a Webview wrapper for the mobile website, I doubt they're going to do anything about it.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wow that's fucked. Have they tried to take bibliogram down as well?

[–] noodlejetski@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

they're definitely making it a pain to use.

load more comments (6 replies)