Intrigued by the fact that many Bibliogram/Nitter/Invidious/Piped instances are from sites that also offer other services, I set out with good will to sift through them one by one, and here are the results: (and I must say I discovered many instances that are not indexed on the “official” directories).

Obviously if I missed any I will point them out and add them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] octt@feddit.it 5 points 2 years ago

Just avoid using their name anywhere, going as far as having an interactive script for when someone wants to compile from source that asks "what is the domain of the worst social network site ever?" You answer "facebook.com", the script replaces some placeholder text with the actual domain in every source file

I'm not joking either, the only reason they have the legal right to C&D these projects is because they are using trademarked names without consent