shitposting

1633 readers

997 users here now

Rules •1. No Doxxing •2. No TikTok reposts •3. No Harassing •4. Post Gore at your own discretion, Depends if its funny or just gore to be an edgelord.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

not@lemmy.ml

207

to put it nicely (lemm.ee)

submitted 5 months ago by jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee to c/shitposting@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Nobody's "coming after us". We've used up the resources. You know how early humans could just find iron sands or copper nuggets? Well now you can't do that. Resources that didn't need mining have been used up, and whatever will be left in processed form (iron rebar, cars, you get the idea) is processed to the point it requires our current machine civilization to recycle. Can't just toss it into a bronze age blacksmith forge and call it a day. Likewise with the fuels.

So no, nobody's coming after us

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

You can smelt aluminium with as little as a candle. Its normally incredibly hard to refine but we've left tons of that stuff in pure form all over the place. Fossil fuels would likely be a pain but charcoal exists and would do buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo for smelting iron with a well built forge, It'd be harder to do but finding clearly artifical constructs made of the stuff would probably give them a huge incentive to figure out how to melt the stuff as opposed to our civilization that didn't even know iron could be smelted for a really long time.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You misinterpreted what I meant.

"Those who come after" doesn't mean someone's coming after us as in chasing us.

Those who come after as in those who exist after us. Future humans or whatever species takes over after we inevitably fuck ourselves over.

Edit: I'm the dumb dumbass here. I'm the one who misinterpreted what was said.

As a true rebuttal with my updated understanding, I don't see humans dying out. We already survived one mass extinction. I have no doubt we'll in one way or another survive the next.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

And this exchange right here serves as another exhibit for Prof. Cox point.

E: Redemption achieved, but still serves as reminder to read before posting :p

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Edit: No I get it now. I'm the one who misinterpreted what was said. I'm stupid.

[–] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago

Spare us the "Oh humans are so stoopid (except me)" rubbish

[–] shatterling@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Shanty towns might be the highest form of recycling we can manage.