this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
574 points (96.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
626 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
574
I’ve got a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty baby, and I’ll write your name: Just Stop Oil paint private jets hours after Taylor Swift’s lands (juststopoil.org)
submitted 5 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
188 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The Stone Henge people are saying that the water, lichen, and powder would have reacted badly. I do not have the education to know if that's true or not.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Strangley, 2 days ago they said they'll have to get the experts out to have a look at it, before they can tell.

What a very quick turnaround that, apparently, was......

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

They’re probably just a bunch of upset babies blowing everything out of proportion, of course they would go to the most unlikely and extreme outcome.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 months ago

Meh.

Their job is to defend stonehenge at all costs. They wouldn't let people look at it if they could get away with it.

Of course they're going to say that the powder is reckless and could potentially upset the lichen or something.

It's hard to believe that this stunt could have any measurable impact in another 10 years or so.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nor did the protesters I would guess.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Neither do the media outlets, but that's the story their running with because the oil companies run ads on their networks.