Asklemmy

43889 readers

2897 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What mundane things of our era could be seen as beautiful or admirable in the future? (mander.xyz)

submitted 5 months ago by Mothra@mander.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For example, buildings and houses more than a hundred years old keep getting more and more rare, and often have an aesthetic that stands out, more ornate or with a particular style that most people can't afford today or that is not financially convenient etc. But back in the day, that's how things were built and most people didn't put much thought into it.

Another example, illustrations for advertisements ( either billboards or magazines). Up until the 60s (declining from the 70s onwards) a lot of ads had hand drawn illustrations, which required a lot of skill and talent to make. Yet people took them for granted, it was the standard quality of illustration for ads.

So the question is, are we currently mass producing something that will be seen in a similar light in a couple of generations? Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Agreed with the keyboards. They'll probably become a tool specifc for certain professions only.

I see your point with the battery, but I'm not sure if I'm getting it completely. I also agree, it's wasteful and not environmentally responsible. But by the time a battery needs replacing, the device is obsolete not because it's worn out but because it's obsolete, there are much more powerful models our in the market which can handle the much more demanding software. I guess what I'm trying to say it that batteries are far from being the only problem in that whole situation.

I wonder if streaming services will be herded back together in the future. TV is a relatively new thing, and I wonder if what we are seeing is the beginning of a pattern. Perhaps some sort of third party that curates content from several competitors.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The battery issue isn't just in devices that go obsolete. It is also in devices like bike lights where the original functionality never changes. And even in devices like a smartphone, phone battery life often drops off far before the useful life ends.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Yes, that's what I'm getting at, the useful life of the device isn't over but for most people is more convenient to just replace it.