Privacy

31991 readers

805 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

122

In the light of Snowden's latest post: What are your FOSS-AIs? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 5 months ago by Peter_Arbeitslos@discuss.tchncs.de to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

His post: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/17400082

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

what about redistributability?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago

That would be part of what's required for them to be "open-weight".

A plain old binary LLM model is somewhat equivalent to compiled object code, so redistributability is the main thing you can "open" about it compared to a "closed" model.

An LLM model is more malleable than compiled object code, though, as I described above there's various ways you can mutate an LLM model without needing its "source code." So it's not exactly equivalent to compiled object code.