Asklemmy

43909 readers

869 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

210

Can I refuse MS Authenticator? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 5 months ago by Martin@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

262 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose "any authenticator" and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it's demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You left out two things:

It doesn't change anything for the company if they allow the normal TOTP protocol in MS Authenticator. People who don't care will use it. People who care can use other authenticator apps.
The reason companies insist on MS Authenticator is because it reports the employee's location.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't change anything for the company with exception to billable IT time used when the authenticator confuses users which is already high with only one authenticator.
It doesn't report location, Entra login reports location regardless of authentication method used.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Why should users care about the company's billables, first of all. Secondly, it's a red herring because there's nothing compelling them to offer support for 3rd party authenticators or even mention them. It's just a flip switch in the settings. Savvy users will try a 3rd party first anyway.
Potayto, potato. The location info comes from and including Authenticator. What is the point of fetching location in a TOTP generator if not to check up on it?

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

The company makes the rules under which you are employed. If you don't like it, legislate against it or find another employer. Also, like I said, there are no 3rd party authenticators that are more secure with entra ID.
Like I said, M$ auth literally does not report location while authenticating. It only pulls location requests when signing in through the app to create the authentication token and even then it is not a requirement. Entra pulls location using your IP address on the device you are signing in with.