this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
734 points (100.0% liked)

196

16500 readers
3122 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

First the Google Bard demo, then the racial bias and pedophile sympathy of Gemini, now this.

It's funny that they keep floundering with AI considering they invented the transformer architecture that kickstarted this whole AI gold rush.

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Here is an article about it. Even if it's technically right in some ways, the language it uses tries to normalize pedophilia in the same ways as sexualities. Specifically the term "Minor Attracted Person" is controversial and tries to make pedophilia into an Identity like "Person of Color".

It was lampshading the fact this is a highly dangerous disorder. It shouldn't be blindly accepted but instead require immediate psychiatric care at best.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/feb/28/googles-gemini-chatbot-soft-on-pedophilia-individu/

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

I think you're misunderstanding. This is NOT normalizing it at all. This is giving you an actual answer/explanation to why those people think and act like they do.

Normalizing would be saying something such as "it's okay or just accept it" but that's not what's going on here.

It should also then mention how wrong it is to have those feelings and that those people have some sort of mental health issue and need to be evaluated.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago

I did not hear about the pedo sympathy, Jesus fucking Christ™