this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
579 points (98.5% liked)

Games

16828 readers
1184 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
579
Video Game Execs Are Ruining Video Games (jacobin.com)
submitted 6 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 13 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I wonder... does anyone know how many shares in a company you have to own before you can call-in during shareholder meetings to ask questions? I'm wondering if we could push back against this by """asking questions""" that make majority shareholders aware of the damage companies are doing to their own brands. I know modern capitalism is all about "money today, fuck tomorrow", but I wonder how many shareholders would be happy knowing that companies would probably make more money if they'd stop cannibalizing studios and franchises.

You know, play into their greed and make convincing arguments about how their decisions are ultimately robbing them of money.

[–] Lath@kbin.earth 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Exxon just sued its shareholders for crying about climate change.

[–] freebread@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

There was a guy a few years ago who spent $40k on Nintendo stock in order to ask about a new F-Zero in a shareholder meeting. They said no at the time but we did get F-Zero 99 last year so maybe he did make an impact.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They have a term for that type of shareholder... that I can't think of right now, sorry. A lot of big companies have things in place so 'disruptive' shareholders don't ruin their plans.

Edit. Exxon calls them "activist shareholders"

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You're assuming that they don't know that, lol. They do. It does not matter because people keep shoving money up their ass and number goes up.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 6 months ago

Ultimately, do they care? Most shareholders are in it for the stock price, this kind of thing might affect it slightly but I doubt it'd shift the needle much