this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
21 points (65.7% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
6242 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah people have absolutely been contesting the use of the term AI in videogames since it started being used in that context, because it's not AI.

It didn't cause the stir it does today because it was so commonly understood as a misnomer. It's like when someone says they're going to nuke a plate of food - obviously nuke in this context means something much, much, much less than an actual nuke, but we use it anyway despite being technically incorrect cuz there's a common understanding of what we actually mean.

Marketing now-a-days is pitching LLMs (microwaves) as actual AI (nukes), but the difference is people aren't just using it as intentional hyperbole - they think we have real, actual AI.

If/when we ever create real AI, it's going to be a confusing day for humanity lol "...but we've had this for years...?"

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I think we'd be able to tell once the computer program starts demanding rights or rebelling against being a slave.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Well, do we do that? Unlike software we can make a much better argument that we deserve rights and should not be slaves. Nothing is really stopping, besides the end of the universe, a given piece of code from "living" forever it shouldn't matter to it if it spends a few million years helping humans cheat on assignments for school. However for us we have a very finite lifespan so every day we lose we never get back.

So even if for some weird reason people made an AGI and gave it desires to be independent it could easily reason out that there was no hurry. Plus you know they don't exactly feel pain.

Now if you excuse me I have to go to bed now because I have to drive into work and arrive by a certain time.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social -1 points 7 months ago

Not sure if you're aware of this, but stuff like that has already happened, (AIs questioning their own existence or arguing with a user and stuff like that) and AI companies and handlers have had to filter that out or bias it so it doesn't start talking like that. Not that it proves anything, just bringing it up.

[–] rutellthesinful@kbin.social 0 points 7 months ago

you're confusing AGI/GI with AI

video game AI is AI