Asklemmy

43851 readers

1667 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Are presidential systems inherently susceptible to authoritarianism? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by tomasz@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Poed_P@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thus anarchism is born. Just don't build structures that function on central authorities.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

In practice, anarchist organization end up with implicit power structures and authority as does with every group of humans. The fact that people aren't consciously aware of that these structures exist in their organizations makes the whole problem far worse.