this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
649 points (100.0% liked)

196

16223 readers
3079 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If your opposed to calls to violence against those that are trying to take away trans rights that's fine. I'm just curious about calling authoritarianism.

In calling for violence against fascists...who's authority are we upholding?

[–] tux0r@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Enforcing your preferred kind of politics with guns sounds like a bad idea. I’m German, we did that a few times in our history.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Wait... I'm sorry I have to respond again because this really just hit me. Did you really use GERMANY as an example of why you SHOULD NOT stand up to facisim with violence? GERMANY???

How did letting the facisim play out for ya there champ?

[–] tux0r@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The street fights in 1932 did not do much to prevent fascism, to say the least.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like they should have tried harder.

[–] skulbuny@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Sounds like they should've had guns

[–] tux0r@feddit.de 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yet here you are saying if you stand up to fascism with violence you're being authoritative.

[–] tux0r@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because my country has seen what happens when political disagreements are fought out in months of street battles.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

And the world has seen what happens because you gave up on those fights.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The street fights in 1932 did not do much to prevent fascism, to say the least.

Yes they did.

[–] tux0r@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

1933 would like to ask a question or two about that.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

Are you falsely claiming if those mean ol' KDP hadn't punched Hans over there in the face the Nazis wouldn't have burned the Reichstag?

Because taken to end you would seem to be arguing for more violence, and 1945 has some followup questions for you.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't be so proudly proclaiming "I'm German" as if that gives you automatic and universal knowledge, or authority, if you'd like, on, well, anything, if I were you, instead I'd get out of the way, humble myself, and go study some history.

"Only one thing could have stopped our movement – if our adversaries had understood its principle and from the first day smashed with the utmost brutality the nucleus of our new movement." -Adolf Hitler

having interacted with an austrian, whom i refer to as german on the regular (it's an ongoing joke) It's almost like that one time that one thing happened is a part of every german/austrias personality now. That explicit kind of speech is so heavily regulated that even merely mentioning it i've been yelled at before.

It's kind of like living somewhere where a mass shooting has happened, that you were tangentially related to. Nobody talks about it. But also everybody knows about it.

[–] Norgur@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oi, can you perhaps not ask for humility and then condescendingly lecture other people about the history of their Nations? Thanks.

I bet you know about the armed conflicts in the streets of Germany before the Nazis were elected into power and the role of the SA, right? And you know that what's was implied here was that the Weimarer Republik tried to "reign in" the Nazis instead of opposing them openly, especially the catholic Zentrum party. And you know that behind the war-like rhetoric of Hitler there is usually a kernel of political nature, and his warmongering style is identical if he talks about real armed conflict or political stuff, right?

You know all that so you can lecture Germans on German history, right?... Right?

Stepping out of the way is the exact opposite of what should be done. This may never happen ever again.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Sure. That's fine. I'm questioning how you call that authoritism. Would you call the black panthers this? After all they certainly did some violent things during the civil rights movements.

What about the IRA?

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 months ago

Combating fascism at embracing it are two wildly different things, any appearance otherwise is simply superficial

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 9 points 5 months ago

Enforcing your preferred kind of politics with guns sounds like a bad idea. I’m German, we did that a few times in our history.

Yeah, and people with guns fucking stopped you.

it's a paradox by nature, either you let them take rule, and then you get a german history moment, or you forcibly oust them, which is also kind of tangential to said german history moment.

I suppose it's a question of which you value more, and how many of your people are ok with it.