this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
81 points (97.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8615 readers
1381 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Acting and professional sports are dream jobs with plenty of fresh faces waiting in line and yet they have unions.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Actors and professional athletes both have an advantage: name recognition. There is only one Tom Holland, there is only one Michael Jordan. It doesn't matter how many people are lined up, the industry cannot replace them 1-for-1. The same is not true of video game development. Think of the last video game you played, do you know the name of even a single developer that worked on it? Almost certainly not. That person will be replaced by one of thousands of people in line; Tom Holland cannot be. This gives actors and athletes significantly more bargaining power to affect change in the industry, such as forming unions.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago

Don't they both have a Union?

[–] Zorque@kbin.social -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's tons of recognition in game development as well. Notch? ConcernedApe? Peter Molyneux?

There's tons of no-name actors and athletes to go with the big names as well.

[–] nac82@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This was an ironic read for me. Your examples really solidified the opposite of your point for me. People can name their top 20 favorite offensive linemen in football. You had an entire industry and thought of 3 names that most people even within the fandoms would fail to recognize.

Who even is concerned Ape?

[–] Zorque@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just because you don't recognize them doesn't mean no one else would be able to. I couldn't name an athlete I hadn't read about in the last five minutes if I tried. That doesn't mean they don't have name recognition.

Interesting that you only chose one of the three names as something you didn't recognize.

[–] nac82@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Lmao, I'm talking to a person who couldn't name a single one of Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods, Michael Phelps, Babe Ruth, Messi, Usain Bolt, Muhammid Ali, etc... let's do some less top athletes and just drop some athlete names I can do off the top of my head: Brett Farve, Manning, Mike Tyson, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Williams sisters,

I'll probably try to think of more later.

then, I don't think you can be considered a trustworthy input on this topic. That says so much more about you than anything else.

It's such a monumentally clueless statement about the world around you. I would be embarrassed to out myself as that clueless on physical fitness. This is all coming from a guy who never watched sports, except maybe in high school a decade+ ago.

No shit I told you I don't recognize the name I said I didn't recognize. I've followed video games and worked in video game development for 25+ years. I was establishing how far you were fishing for 3 recognizable names, even amongst would be experts on the subject.

Yea, I don't trust your input. It feels better to assume you wrote that comment in bad faith rather than out of cluelessness.