this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
20 points (88.5% liked)

News

23329 readers
3484 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Communities around the U.S. have seen shootings carried out with weapons converted to fully automatic in recent years, fueled by a staggering increase in small pieces of metal or plastic made with a 3D printer or ordered online. Laws against machine guns date back to the bloody violence of Prohibition-era gangsters. But the proliferation of devices known by nicknames such as Glock switches, auto sears and chips has allowed people to transform legal semi-automatic weapons into even more dangerous guns, helping fuel gun violence, police and federal authorities said.

The (ATF) reported a 570% increase in the number of conversion devices collected by police departments between 2017 and 2021, the most recent data available.

The devices that can convert legal semi-automatic weapons can be made on a 3D printer in about 35 minutes or ordered from overseas online for less than $30. They’re also quick to install.

“It takes two or three seconds to put in some of these devices into a firearm to make that firearm into a machine gun instantly,” Dettelbach said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

ban... everything other than bolt action restricted rifles, break open shotguns, and single action revolvers.

Well, okay then. There's your middle ground. Even if you don't go quite that far, one of the low-key wins the gun lobby has had is in reframing assault rifle bans as bleeding heart pansies who are afraid of a Red Rider and want to ban "scary black guns" without knowing what they are.

In reality, it's simply not difficult to define what an "assault rifle" should be with sufficient certainty to make end-runs complicated, expensive, and relatively simple to nail down later:

  • Semiautomatic (or burst or full-auto, obviously).
  • Can be chambered in a round with ammunition that has energy "X" with effective range of "Y" when manufactured using materials readily available to the industry, with that term subject to regulations promulgated and revised by the ATF.
  • Has a magazine larger than "Z" rounds or has interchangeable magazines, particularly if they can be made an arbitrary size. An integrated tube or box magazine is very different from an AR-15 mag that can hold as many rounds as the product designer and materials engineer can make work, and that was specifically designed to be changed in a couple of seconds.

Those are the things that make a "hunting rifle" into one that's mostly suitable for hunting humans, regardless of what material the stock is made from.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That will never fly as a "middle ground" because the second amendment was never written as a hunter's law. It's a Revolutionary, shooting-at-people law that didn't take into account advances in technology because they didn't matter.

What they had different were people upset with a government across the ocean and soldiers in their homes, and the only people upset with the colonists were slaves that weren't allowed guns, education, or freedom. So that made the problem we face way less likely.

Any middle ground like you suggest would take a constitutional amendment and mass adoption, and the ones with the guns that aren't likely to shoot up the place (Jan 6th excluded) are not keen on either.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the 2nd amendment always took into account the advances in weaponry by tying it to state militias. The goal was to keep the feds from disarming the states, not to allow everyone to buy a personal nuke.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At the beginning of the revolutionary war, militias, minutemen, and even the Continental army relied on soldiers to bring their own weapons from home. They would never have held off British troops long enough to have a revolution at all otherwise. This was an 8 year war, and only after 1776 did they begin to supply the Continental army with arms from France on the regular. Spain as well.

It was absolutely their intention to have regular citizens armed. With nuclear weapons? No. Be serious. With small arms able to be used by one person. To my knowledge, private citizens didn't have access to cannons at a reliable quantity to count on them in battle.

This is what our flawed founding fathers experienced first hand and amended the Constitution with.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Look either you believe the constitution applies to new weapons or it doesn't. Be serious.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"We want less effective guns! Disarm yourselves!"

"The Christo-facists are taking over!"

"They be starting trains for LGBT people!"

I'm a peaceful man, I am not harmless. You keep on being harmless. It's your right and I fully support it, and I mean that. Just not for me and mine.

things that make a "hunting rifle" into one that's mostly suitable for hunting humans

Did you know AR-15s are illegal to hunt with in some states because the rounds aren't lethal enough? LOL, a .223 or 5.56 looks like a BB gun vs. a 30.06 or .308. But you're OK with the hunting rifles!

As a liberal gun nut, I'm constant looking and asking for ideas on this issue. And BTW, you have sane ideas, kinda. But they won't pass 2A muster in the courts. So keep stumping for lost causes I guess?

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

because the rounds aren’t lethal enough?

Because the goal is to kill the animal quickly with limited pain. "not lethal enough" entails every lethal wound that takes minutes and hours to kill instead of seconds. But for killing humans there is a reason why armies prefer 5.56 over .308 in most standard issued weapons.

[–] KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social 1 points 8 months ago

Meanwhile, 5.56 is plenty if you are accurate.

And, the US military is currently adopting the MCX Fury as their new standard issue rifle.

That thing fires the .277 fury cartridge that is way better at armor penetration than 5.56 ever could be.

And the reason .308 isn't used as much for most military issued rifles is more to do with recoil and capacity than anything to do with the ballistics.

A .308 would be far better for killing literally anything than 5.56, but is mostly for use in semi-auto marksman rifles and some snipers. Where accuracy of first shot matters more than volume of fire.