this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
11 points (92.3% liked)

World News

38581 readers
1912 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

East Asia countries birth rate crisis continues. In response to total fertility rate of 0.55, Korea enhances infertility aid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think world wide we need a population decline to reduce global warming but you also need a population to keep a culture alive

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Leaders don't really care about the culture. The current economic and financial system need growth and most growth comes from increasing population. That's their real concern.

[–] ViXY_DBC@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No question the world is struggling with 9 billion people, and developed world is using excessive amount of resources.

The rigid definition of "countries" may stand in the way of a more collaborative world though.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Part of the problem is developing nations are playing catchup and create a lot of pollution. I wouldn’t mind spending some tax money to help them skip straight to green energy.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Careful. The last time I suggested that we needed fewer people in the world, I was accused of being a Eugenicist.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tankies consider any form of population control to be a form of eco fascism. Evangelicals feel pretty much the same.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

I don't think it was tankies replying, but I could be wrong.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, because it’s not true.

We have more than enough resources to feed everyone on earth. We have the land, we have the money to pay the farmers, we have the infrastructure to transport it anywhere in the world easily and quickly. The issue we’re having isn’t too many people, but a small group of people utilizing multiples of the energy they need, and dozens of multiples of the energy of the masses of the world.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wow so cool, responding to someone taking the time to point out why your eugenicist rhetoric is definitively and provably incorrect, and you just respond with memes. You’re so nonchalant.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)