Fun fact: Since "Philosophy" is part of a loop itself, you could say the same thing about any of the 11 element of that loop, including "Three-dimensional space"

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago

And geometry as well as the universe. That was a wild trip, I tried 5 different things.

[–] readthemessage@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I thought the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself.

Edit: I brainfarted while writing. What I meant is "I thought it would be even more interesting if the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself".

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean this part? I don't think that's part of the article. From my understanding, the parentheses isn't counted either.

[–] readthemessage@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Actually, no, but I meant something very different from what I wrote hehe I will edit my comment, thanks!

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I see. I think wikipedia either forbids links to itself or at least it is against every convention

[–] readthemessage@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sounds reasonable

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

And I think a word is never twice linked but only the first time it appears. So if "clicking" will occur a second time, it won't be clickable