this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
147 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5213 readers
541 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
147
Gen Z's climate anxiety is real and needs action -- for everyone's wellbeing (www.sciencedaily.com)
submitted 8 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's weird how this is being approached as if it's just a mental health problem. Decades into the future Gen Z's mental health is going to be the least of their concerns. It's like saying someone who is starving is suffering from anxiety that may have significant long-term consequences. Yeah, their mental health probably isn't great and it's going to get worse, but that's not their primary long-term difficulty.

[โ€“] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Its just crisis stalling, first you ignore the problem, then you distract from the cause of the problem, then you try to mitigate the effects of the problem, but of course we don't try to solve the problem cause that would cost rich people money.

Imagine a miserable fish in a gross aquarium, a capitalist would try to feed the fish happy pills instead of cleaning the environment that makes the fish miserable.