this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
425 points (94.9% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2943 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The next years are going to be fun… The world is burning while the fossil fuel industry is chugging along like everything is great as long as you buy enough co2 credits.

I’m scared in what kind of world my children will have to live in…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0ddysseus@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Weather and even temperature are a bit of a red herring in all this. The extreme weather is caused by the rising temps and feedback loops, but what's happening is just the heat trying to normalize. We're not going to end up with 70c at the equator and -30c at the poles. Look at the cretaceous temp, CO2, and fossil records and you'll see that the temp evens out even with CO2 massively higher then today, and you end up with things like temperate rainforest at the south pole. Our real issue and the one we should be actively fighting against (as in actual in-the-street rebellion) is the absolute destruction of the environment. Chemical dumping, strip mining, industrial fishing, industrial agriculture, forever chemicals, microplastics, desertification and deforestation. These things are going to cause ecological collapse and kill almost everyone in the next generation or two, no question about it. We don't have to worry about the heat getting us

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some parts of the world definitely do have to worry about the heat getting them. We've already seen wet bulb temperatures exceeding human habitability in places where millions live, and some recent studies have suggested that in the long run our metric for true human habitability may actually be too wide.

[–] XiELEd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From where I am in the Philippines, it's a huge fucking deal. We've been getting supertyphoons more frequently, more intense and abrupt storms, and if not that, regular temperatures more than 30C°, and our country being an archipelago, is humid AF. We've been getting more crop shortages, more droughts, even constant hours-long water interruptions in the big cities. Not to mention, the huge damages due to those typhoons.

[–] awderon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are right, all these other problems are also really bad. A lot of stuff is happening at the same time. It's hard for me to read about all the shit that is going down and not be able to do anything impactful against these things.

[–] 0ddysseus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah its really tough and I try to limit my doomscrolling to the amount needed to stay informed. One huge problem with all this is that it effects the most privileged the least, and even the day to day things we can do to feel like we're helping are only really available to those of us with that privilege. Like, I could say "start a vege garden, buy hemp and wool clothes, fix things in your workshop instead of buying new" but yeah, those aren't really options most people can take unless we change the underlying structure of our society first. But then, why don't we try changing society so we can then fix these issues? In the end, it's all part of the class war, and we're losing badly.

[–] awderon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm living in a flat, this limits what I can do on my own. But I'm looking into getting some solar panels to put up on the balcony, coupled with a storage battery this should bring down the kW/h I need from an external provider.

In the far future I would like to move out of the city and start producing more of my own food, but prices are just to high right now.

[–] ThinlySlicedGlizzy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't be convinced that by lowering your impact you can make any change. Corporations want you to think that because if the masses think that they are the issue then they can continue what they are doing. The only way we can contribute is if we all get on the streets and protest. If millions of people get out on the streets for an indefinite amount of time, stop working, stop buying things, and demand change then we will get change.

[–] FatLegTed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If millions of people get out on the streets for an indefinite amount of time, stop working, stop buying things Sadly, this will never happen. People are too lazy, selfish and wrapped up in this 'Gotta have cheap, sparkly plastic tat' that they've seen on an 'influencers' Instagram or TikTok page.

Doesn't stop the rest of us doing our bit though, to keep our conscience clear 😒

[–] jantin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

no, those peple will be just mowed down by automatic weapons fire until put in their place.

AI's creators are taking care to ultimately obsolete as many people as possible. If you're not a source of profit to a capitalist you're disposable. If you're a source of a cost then you're to be disposed of as fast as possible. There are several billion people fleeing uninhabitable areas, they'll gladly replace spoiled woke kids at their spots in factories and glass towers.

Sorry for bluntness but this is the reality in the minds of those who rule.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

prices are just to high right now

They're not likely to get lower.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

There are about 3,000 billionaires, many of which who caused this. And how many of us? Billions? We know what we need to do. Pass laws that stop prioritizing insane billionaire agendas, or a French revolution. There is no other alternative to avoiding our world burning. It's not what anyone wants to hear but it's true. That's why people like Spez wanna hide away in a bunker because they're afraid of the rest of the population.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weather and even temperature are a bit of a red herring in all this. The extreme weather is caused by the rising temps and feedback loops, but what’s happening is just the heat trying to normalize.

More and more severe extreme weather events are a bad thing, aren't they?

Environmental destruction is bad, yes. But climate change causes a host of major issues (adding ocean acidification to your list). Rising temperatures and extreme weather certainly will cause deaths and trouble long before the heat normalized, if that ever happens.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Bad weather is also expensive AF. There's a reason reinsurers such as MunichRE aren't on the climate change denial train: They see the writing on the wall of not being able to back the insurers you buy your flood insurance from at a price point anyone could afford. If the damages become too high on aggregate, things simply become uninsurable (hence also why states don't require nuclear plants to have insurance but back them themselves but that's another can of hidden subsidy worms).

People are talking about "but investment in climate-friendly technology costs money and we must think of the economy and prosperity" -- motherfucker if you were thinking about prosperity and the economy you wouldn't set us on a path towards cities being destroyed faster than we can build them. Broken window fallacy times a million.