Technology

37707 readers

482 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

188

Apple will require notarization for apps from third party app stores, and will disable updates for apps installed via third party app stores if staying outside EU (support.apple.com)

submitted 8 months ago by brie@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As far as I can tell this basically means that all apps must be approved by Apple to follow their "platform policies for security and privacy" even if publishing on a third party app store. They will also disable updating apps from third party app stores if you stay outside the EU for too long (even if you are a citizen of an EU country, with an Apple account set to the EU region).

The idea that preventing app updates is in line with their claims of protecting security is utterly absurd. "Never attibute to malice what can be explained with stupidity," but Apple isn't stupid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 21 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Apple users will accept anything Apple does to them. In their eyes, Apple can do no wrong. They will defend this all the mental hoops they have available.

I'd like to see Apple hurt, but somehow, I want to see its users hurt even more. They willingly buy these products and even defend them. Things should just get so bad that even the most devout Apple user questions Apple. No idea how bad it has to get, but I'd be very curious to find out.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] acastcandream@beehaw.org 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

spoiler

asdfasdfsadfasfasdf

[–] minishoemaze@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago

I don't think you'll find a lot of Microsoft love around these parts either lol

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Are you having trouble with the "users" part? Would you like an s/user/fanboy/g?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You care too much about this. Let people enjoy things.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure, enjoy aiding an $EvilCorp 👍 You do you. Have fun, babe.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I run GrapheneOS. I'm also not a dick about it.

[–] brie@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that Apple doesn't accept the responsibility. it's the DMA that's doing this to their customers, not Apple. By vilifying the DMA as harmful to privacy and security, Apple gets to make themselves out to be the good guy. When things get worse, Apple can just blame the DMA again.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 8 months ago

The DMA was written in good faith. Apple is acting in bad faith. And yes, their customers are too simple minded to think for themselves, which is exactly why Apple can say stuff like "DMA bad" and have millions of people agree after sabotaging the implementation. It's not a surprise the EU wants to curtail that (we'll see if that still stays the case after the elections, when the Apple voters show up at the urns).

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0