this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
840 points (98.3% liked)

News

23293 readers
6429 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a surprise move, an Illinois judge has removed former President Donald Trump from the state’s ballot based on the 14th Amendment’s so-called “insurrectionist ban.”

The decision is paused, giving Trump a short period of time to appeal.

Wednesday’s unexpected decision comes as a similar anti-Trump challenge from Colorado is pending before the US Supreme Court, which is widely expected to reject arguments that Trump is barred from office.

Cook County Circuit Judge Tracie Porter heavily relied on the prior finding by the Colorado Supreme Court, calling Colorado’s “rationale compelling.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The discussion was about how states could just ignore SCOTUS. It had moved on from the topic in the article.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As far as I understand, your argument was if Illinois ignores a SCOTUS ruling that allows southern states to also ignore SCOTUS rulings, which they are already doing. What is your argument if I've misunderstood, and what is your proposal in regards to how states should deal with a ruling that is contrary to what the law should be?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the comment I was responding to:

States don’t have to obey the supreme court.

The supreme court is a suggestion body more than anything else.

As soon as we stop taking them seriously, they stop having power.

And if that is the case, any Southern state can ignore Plessy v. Ferguson.

But it is clearly not the case.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alabama is currently ignoring the Supreme Court's directive to redraw their congressional map.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I know. I already brought that up. And, again, if Alabama is legally able to do that, they are also legally able to ignore Plessy. It's one or the other.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

if Alabama is legally able to do that

What are the consequences for Alabama doing that?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We'll have to wait and see apparently. Does that change what I said somehow?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Considering Illinois would not be setting a precedent here, yes.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You have yet to explain why Southern states couldn't just ignore Plessy if SCOTUS rulings are just suggestions.

(Remember? The thing I was replying to?)