this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
173 points (98.9% liked)

worldnews

4836 readers
2 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reversal of smoking ban criticised as ‘shameful’ for lacking evidence

New Zealand is repealing the world’s first smoking ban passed under former prime minister Jacinda Arden’s government to pave the way for a smoke-free generation amid backlash from researchers and campaigners over its risk to Indigenous people.

The new coalition government led by prime minister Christopher Luxon confirmed the repeal will happen on Tuesday, delivering on one of the actions of his coalition’s ambitious 100-day plan.

The government repeal will be put before parliament as a matter of urgency, enabling it to scrap the law without seeking public comment, in line with previously announced plans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There are already laws against littering. And lots of things affecting our healthcare system and economy. Sports, processed food, alcohol

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Comparing sports, processed food and alcohol is a false equivalence.

In any case, it's not because problems exist elsewhere that we can't solve this one. It's also much easier to stop the damage by banning cigs like it was done in New Zealand (where thee age limit rises as the population ages) then to fix any of your other examples.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Sure, it's much easier to force people to be healthy, if your goal is a healthier population. But it's morally wrong. People should have the right to make unhealthy decisions.