this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
210 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39021 readers
1282 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I am not here to debate whether public executions are right or wrong but

“Carrying out executions in public adds to the inherent cruelty of the death penalty and can only have a dehumanising effect on the victim and a brutalising effect on those who witness the executions,”

If brutalizing here means people are gonna be shit scared after watching this when even thinking about killing someone, then this is a very bad argument

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (39 children)

It does not reduce murder or crime in general - but it DOES devalue human life

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At least they retained the USamerican values after kicking them out

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The Taliban were assholes long before 9/11.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The Taliban were US-backed and US-funded long before 9/11.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That's a common assumption that's based in "they're all the same over there" style of racism.

The group the US backed in the 80s was the mujaheddin, which went to form the government which the Taliban (a separate group) all but overthrew. The last remnants of the pre-Taliban Afghanistan government was called the Northern Alliance, which was allied with the US when fighting the Taliban.

It was politically convenient for the left to along with a racist narrative to score cheap political points against Dubya, Cheney, Rumsfeld etcl. And yeah, fuck those guys for sure, but it was wrong to go along with a racist narrative to do so. Because of the "they're all the same over there" kind of racism in both the left and right of the US, there wasn't much chance for any kind of success in defeating the Taliban.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 7 points 8 months ago

It's not racist to be aware of the fact that the US supported the Taliban after the fall of the Mujaheddin.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only difference is time IMO. Same people. Same views. Just changed their name and fought against different people for different reasons. They will all still stone you to death for teaching math to women, they just disagree on who should be the caliph.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Yes that "they're all the same over there" is a common opinion.

Can't win a war when you can't tell the difference between friend or foe. Which is why the US lost to the Taliban.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] Shard@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (5 children)

No. What happens is the spectators get severely desensitized to violence. Especially if the spectators are young malleable teenagers. And suddenly sawing someone's head off in front of a live broadcast becomes just another day on the job.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (8 children)

The brutalizing effect is the opposite: by seeing this kind of violence, people are more likely to normalize it and engage in violence themselves. That's the hypothesis, anyway.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 8 months ago

never mind the fact that the taliban also does this for sexual assault victims and gay people not just murderers.....