this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
536 points (100.0% liked)

196

16223 readers
2852 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.de 22 points 6 months ago (4 children)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It ticks me off when i see twitch streamers with the fps displayed and its running at 300+ fps. What a waste of electricity, money and hardware.

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Eh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Turn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Reflex at 100 fps still won't compare to 300 fps without Reflex though

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Reflex just shaves off the extra overhead you'd get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won't make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know, that's exactly what I am talking about

I think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then

[–] euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

you might not see a difference between 100fps and 300fps for example, but the feel is certainly there, because those frames are still being rendered and is more information. it can be the difference between landing a headshot and missing for pro players, even if the refresh rate is lower, so its not wasted at all.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

for pro players

Exactly. Most people aren’t pro players however. I’ve also seen this with games like Baldur’s Gate fwiw.

Not only that but people seem to do it sometimes just to flex, when turning on VSync is an objectively better experience with less screen tearing. There’s ZERO reason to drive 300fps when your monitor is only capable of 144Hz.

[–] euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

vsync sucks, real ones use vrr. god i cant type can i??? i didnt know my comment was horribly misspelled until now

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know the VSync setting had to be enabled in a lot of games for VRR to work right?

[–] euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

I don't hit my monitors refresh rate in any game, I don't need to.

[–] Chriswild@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Not only does this reduce GPU power usage but CPU as well.

[–] CucumberFetish@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Already set. I'm not that competitive player and my reflexes are worse than a sloth's. So I didn't even bother to buy a higher refresh rate monitor than 60.