this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
1549 points (96.2% liked)

Work Reform

9997 readers
674 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the point is if either gets fired their livelihoods are at risk. Therefore, making them the same class with the same financial precarity.

Maybe 250k can be unemployed for a bit longer, but ultimately they must return to work.

[โ€“] whereisk@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Usually, to get a $250k job you need to have $250k job trappings, aka you're unlikely to get or keep that job while living, dressing or eating etc as a $50k job person, ending up in the situation you described.

Minimalism seems to be a way to escape the rat-race even through salary, but it seems like a strategy for after you have proven yourself indispensable in a high paying job, not something most people can or will achieve, or are able to then make the necessary life changes.

TLDR if you are a worker become part of a union no matter what salary you're on.