this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37801 readers
288 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whelp, here we go again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shufflerofrocks@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's simply a more honest model - you get content, they get money.

I would love to be able to pay for an ad-free experience for the various websites and services that I browse and use in a straightforward way instead of being leeched for ad-revenue

[–] anon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't doubt paying a hundred per month to have an ad-free life.

no ads on tv or sports, no billboards, no ads on buses. it would be awesome

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

But they still collect your data, so not that straight forward.

[–] justgohomealready 1 points 2 years ago

The thing is that first you pay in order to avoid ads, but ads will start creeping in on the paid version in no time. Some day you'll find yourself paying and still seeing as many ads as they decide to push. The same has been done in other platforms. Cable TV didn't have ads when I was a kid, "because it was paid".