this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
485 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whelp, here we go again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Hot take: this sucks, but YouTube premium is legit. I wish more platforms offered a paid, ad-free way to interact. I don't feel like figuring out a way around ads but I'm not about to start watching them. So I pay a few bucks a month.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I'd be more willing to pay if it wasn't $10/mo (annual cost) for a bunch of stuff I don't care about. If they had a cheaper option that was just ad-free (maybe $5/mo?), I'd be down for that.

I also like what Kagi does with their duo plan for 2 users. Some kind of duo plan for YT premium would be nice as well, since I (and many others, I'm sure) don't have a family of 6 people.

[–] African_Grey@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Screw YouTube and Google. They aren’t getting a dime from me.

[–] popshabang@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I don't mind paying for services I use to avoid my data being the payment (like Kagi or Protonmail).

But I don't like the idea of paying Google AND having my data farmed.

[–] kukkurovaca@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I don't have any philosophical objection for paying to use a platform I enjoy, but in the case of youtube, they have been so deliberately detrimental to society in terms of platforming fascists that I feel bad about the prospect of paying them, even if much of the money is going to creators I do like who I'm actually watching

[–] shufflerofrocks@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's simply a more honest model - you get content, they get money.

I would love to be able to pay for an ad-free experience for the various websites and services that I browse and use in a straightforward way instead of being leeched for ad-revenue

[–] anon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't doubt paying a hundred per month to have an ad-free life.

no ads on tv or sports, no billboards, no ads on buses. it would be awesome

[–] justgohomealready 1 points 1 year ago

The thing is that first you pay in order to avoid ads, but ads will start creeping in on the paid version in no time. Some day you'll find yourself paying and still seeing as many ads as they decide to push. The same has been done in other platforms. Cable TV didn't have ads when I was a kid, "because it was paid".

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

But they still collect your data, so not that straight forward.

[–] Linnce@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also the student version is so cheap and there is so much more content than anything really. YouTube music is awesome too.

[–] Scrumpf_Dabogy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Same. I hate google, but YouTube pays content creators better than any other platform. And I am 100% on board with any service where I pay a monthly cost instead of being inundated with ads.