Asklemmy

43851 readers

1543 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Do vampires respect tenants rights? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do the people need to be aware their home has been foreclosed on, or can it say, be done as a legal fiction in the dead of night by a vampire corrupted bank to allow entry?

There was a 2020 documentary that elucidates this to some degree, in the sense that Vampire rules are only as effective as both the people and the vampire in question believe in them. For example, the whole burning under the daylight sun trope is merely a state of mind/habit reinforced by generations of preyed upon cultures to the degree that the vampire believes it themselves.

To this then, I say that both the vampire and the people need to be aware their home has been foreclosed on for any effect to occur.